Sources checked: 7 September 2026
What has changed?
The European Commission explains that the amended AI Act still calls for AI literacy measures. No specific certificate is required. A learning programme should reflect the applications and people involved.
Let the work shape the learning
Someone drafting text practises checking sources and handling confidential information. A process owner also works through exceptions, authorisation and stopping a process. A manager considers accountability, cost and when expert assessment is needed. These are different questions; one general presentation rarely addresses them all.
A practical learning pathway
Our proposed approach combines short self-study, a team session and an exercise based on the actual process. Use fictional data. Ask participants to identify a convincing but incorrect answer, explain which source is missing and decide who can approve it. Then discuss which working instruction needs to change.
Keep useful evidence
A simple record can capture the audience, learning objective, content version, date and agreed follow-up. Assessment results are only useful if their meaning is clear. Do not retain personal practice prompts or actual customer files as routine learning evidence. Agree who may access the record and how long it is needed.
Learning needs maintenance
A new tool, different data or broader decision authority may require new guidance. A participation record shows what someone attended; it does not establish that every process is safe. The useful follow-up question is which specific working agreement the lesson helps the team carry out.
What you can use it for
A learning plan for each role, with one practical exercise and an agreed review point.
This guide provides general information. Assessment of a specific application depends on your role, data and intended use.
Sources and further reading
This article was prepared with AI assistance and checked against our editorial and sourcing guidelines.